Just wondering what protocol is used to decide their response to an amergency. For example, if a particular office becomes aware that a 3 y/o is hanging from a tree someplace in their territory, do they all drop tools and rush to the site ?? Take that a bit further & say they become aware of ten 'emergencies' all at the same time. Do they vacate the office so that everyone can do their bit to help a poor defenceless kiddies or do they leave one of their number to guard the place & call in another office or CPIU or whatever ?? It really would be a shame if the 'emergency' didn't exist or accessing the site entailed extreme risk to the CSO but how would they know what was involved without attending ??

Now this is the Truth.
If a woman touches the child on the private parts whilst the child is hanging off a tree they might investigate.
If a man touched the child in the private parts whilst the child is hanging off the tree the child would be rescued IMMEDIATELY thus the child would be saved and arrest the man in the process.
If nobody touched the child in any sexual way DOCS would say fuck it, its not our job and they would let the child die.

Hmmmm ...... I wouldn't have credited the evil ones with sufficient intelligence to make such differentiations between options.

Actually I had something else in mind but was hoping someone could read my mind

The Dept wouldn't rush anywhere near the child but to the courts for a TAO making out they did a sighting of the child and an interview with the parents who wouldn't consent to protective options the dept claims to have made to the parents therefore there request for a TAO would be granted and then they would wait until the child is either happy, sound asleep in bed or at school when they remove the child from home...leaving the parents dumbfounded...

They never attend actual issues of abuse situations...it's always after the fact...

You definitely have a way with words IHGD but what you say pretty well sums it up mate.

It would really be a pity if multiple situations arose that looked so urgent for DOCS attention the evil ones were run off their feet attempting to cope with all the emergencies. The rabid one might even have a stroke or something.

See the magic word is "MAN and Abuse", only then do DOCS get off their fat arses.
See years ago a mate of mine rang the police because he saw someone trying to steal his car in the garage (flash light in garage on)(restored Historic cars worth hundreds of thousands) He rang the cops and they never bothered to come out the same night, He made noise and they bolted. Two months later the internal house alarm went off telling him that someone was prowling around in the garage again around 3am in the morning so this time he rang the cops and told them that a cop was being assaulted out the front of his house and behold him 4 cop cars were there in under 5 minutes.
SO TELL ME ALL IF HE RANG THE COPS AND TOLD THEM THAT SOMEONE WAS TRYING TO STEAL HIS PRIDE AND JOY, WOULD THE COPS HAVE ARRIVED AT HIS PLACE THAT QUICK OR AT ALL. NO
The Same goes for the above with DOCS, you mention MAN and a child and DOCS comes flying out of the wood work.
By the way my mate WAS CHARGED BY THE PIGS for making this false call but the PIGS let the thieves get away, You wonder why the police today have lost everyone respect.

Its sad that you have to think that way but unfortunately you are correct because times have changed for the worst for men today.

We all know they look after their own, you need to see how they look after their own in a court of law and only then you will understand the level of mate ship there is today in the Police Service when one of them is in trouble with the law

The oinkers certainly stick together like glue when any of their number is attacked. A few cases might hit the media but given the lack of transparency, we can't be confident that justice was done in the vast majority of cases. For example, when Commissioner Atkinsons driver was booked for speeding on the ICB, was he or she actually fined / received demerit points ?? I guess we do have at least token checks & balances in the Council for Civil Liberties, Ombudsman, CMC, Ethical Standards, although the latter is possibly / probably a case of putting the fox in charge of the chicken coop. At least the CMC has managed to stir up a hornets nest but I'm not sure the other organizations are worth keeping. I did call O'Gormans office but was far from impressed. Attitude appeared similar to any other legal entity in that the first question was 'how much money are you prepared to throw around'. As far as I'm aware, the Ombudsman forwards all complaints back to the department responsible for the complaint, so what chance exists of independent review ??