Good to see you here thumbsdown but like I tell all this if you come here means Child Stealer's have come into your life. Well you got sucked in by those lovely con artist didn't you, It shows you the tricks they have because this is one of their first tricks they use against us parents is to try to become friends with you but without you knowing the knife slowly goes in.
Well all learn the hard way don't we, the ones that don't bother reading this site and other sites like altnews are mainly the ones that mainly get burnt.

Please all read
http://www.ihategovdept.com/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=73&sid=771414bbb34123d8ad679f9d46c17f13

Please all re-bookmark this site
http://www.ihategovdept.com/

I bet its the Docs moles doing this in their free time. I am very surprised you haven't got one of these bitches join the forum and give you a ear full.

terminator

Don't be surprised that they are watching silently. I was once told that they do not have access to computers at their places of work and that all paperwork has to be done by hand. What a load of ....

Don't believe any lies that these cretans (don't know how to spell it) tell you

Good to see more new members joining with the same common problem CHILD SAFETY

Yes its bad but when a organization gets your Children to draw drawings mainly with dark crayons or pens only because they deliberately want it this way for the one and only reason is to use these drawing against you in a court to make it easier for the crown to get a conviction in my eyes its totally unacceptable.
I wonder how many of our smart Barrister know about this (PS even if they didn't know their ego's would have to say that they knew all about this just to save face)

Oh look there's no arguement from me. If it is for these reasons it is worse than bad, manipulating a child. Having a child grow up being told they were abused will in the young ones make them believe it over time. Changing a child's memories must be a definition of evil.

But it is making no sense because me just being a stay at home mum and not a barrister, knows that if given the choice children go for the dark colours first and then the red one, they don't even need to take away the other bright ones. So why don't the court shrinks know this?

Nah I think that might be a conspiracy theory gone mad. Now we need to find out if all pictures drawn make there way to court or if just ones that suggest something disturbing get there. I don't think I know what a "disturbing" picture would look like given I only foster the under fives and haven't come across many exceptional children when handed some crayons.

No conspiracy theory here, it's simple, if Child Safety get a child to draw drawings that just happen to be dark, even if the drawing itself is not a sign of a child being abused, example drawing pictures of people or animals being harmed, etc, they will use it like said and use it well against the person who has been charged with a criminal offense via one of Child Safety CSO's giving evidence against the accused during the defendants trial.
What concerns me is this has now attracted legal attention and it has been bought up on this forum before that a jury could be swung to a guilty verdict only because an expert witness bought in by Child Safety testifies that these dark drawings are a sign that this child has been abused.

Now, as IHGD has said many times, what would be the legal repercussions if it was found that the selection of colours given to the children were deliberately laid out in such a way where even a child drawing a pretty picture of flowers etc would have no choice but to use a collection of dark colours only.

I have spoken to three professionals over this matter and none of them have ever heard of this before, but has certainly awakened their interest and they have found this very concerning.